Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume I. Organization and Procedures. Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority. The Airworthiness Manual (Doc ) was first published in in two volumes and contained a consolidation of airworthiness-related information previously. Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume II. Design Certification and. Continuing Airworthiness. Approved by the Secretary General.

Author: Monris Kegrel
Country: Venezuela
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 26 June 2004
Pages: 471
PDF File Size: 5.79 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.81 Mb
ISBN: 118-4-19671-906-4
Downloads: 90388
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gronris

The process by which 9670 TAA will undertake this recognition could include: Sustainment usually relates to the requirement to communicate any change to the conditions under which the recognition was originally issued.

While the review process manuao both a desktop and an onsite review, the output of the desktop review can be sufficiently comprehensive to preclude the requirement for the onsite review. Examples may include any of the following: Furthermore, TAA recognition of another AA neither implies, nor requires, that the authority must make any changes to their airworthiness management systems as a result of the recognition.

This standardized assessment tool has been tailored for the military context and takes the form of a question set called the Military Authorities Recognition Question set MARQ reference i. Continuing Airworthiness management is the process by which an aircraft is kept in a condition where it remains airworthy throughout its life – or in other wordsi.

Continuing Airworthiness is therefore not just the maintenance of aircraft and equipment, but also involves monitoring performance of products in service. Recognition can be unilateral, bilateral or multilateral. It remains the responsibility of the TAA to account for any differences in standards and processes, and to decide how any identified gaps are to be managed. Depending on how it is structured within the state, the airworthiness authority may be established as a sub-component of the larger Civil Aviation Authority.


Within a military organization, airworthiness and aviation responsibility may be spread across a number of organizations, and enforcement may only be possible through internal regulations, rules and contracts. Although the owner bears the legal responsibility for continuing airworthiness, there is very much a shared responsibility between:.

It is useful to compare Continued and Continuing as they are sometimes used interchangeably. Safety and airworthiness are sovereign responsibilities. The report provides an overall assessment of acceptability and identifies any areas that require clarification through an onsite review.

Airworthiness Directive – EUROCONTROL ATM Lexicon

Information is provided related to:. Finally, in the military context, recognition can improve flexibility and capacity during joint operations. The process used by the TAA for establishing acceptability of the work and artefacts of another airworthiness regulatory authority is called recognition.

Cranfield University Content control: A recognition does not expire. When granting recognition, the TAA will specify any associated terms or condition.

In the words of ICAO:. Recognition of Airworthiness Authorities Effective Date: For example, for most military organizations, operational effectiveness is paramount and, therefore, aviation safety objectives must be balanced against the need to accept higher levels of risk wherever operational circumstances dictate.

SearchWorks Catalog

For the purpose of this advisory, an airworthiness artefact is a work product from a military or civil airworthiness authority. Recognition — Civil Aviation Authorities 4. For the DND TAA and the Technical 970 Program, this relates to airworthiness certification, production oversight and airworthiness inspection continuing airworthiness. The national military airworthiness authority of a state responsible for the airworthiness of the military aircraft of that state.


Furthermore, there is no single, internationally recognized organization that sets standards or harmonizes the military airworthiness and aviation requirements of MAAs. The ultimate responsibility for continued airworthiness is assigned in ICAO Annex 8 to the State of Design but the programme to achieve continuing airworthiness is a matter for the State of Registry.

The four sub-sections are:. The government statutory authority in each country that oversees the approval and regulation of civil aviation.

For the purposes of this advisory, recognition is defined as the process by which an AA assesses and acknowledges another AA as being a competent regulator, empowered with the necessary authority, infrastructure, resources and mechanisms to ensure aviation safety.

Other military regulators may be organized differently, for example: To enable the provisions of these two TAM chapters, there is a requirement to identify the other regulatory authorities that are acceptable to the TAA and detail the methodology used to establish acceptability. For each of its aircraft, the approved CAMO is required to carry out the following functions. Recognition, therefore, does not transfer any legal responsibilities from the TAA to the recognized AA.

Military Authorities Recognition Question Set. This also includes acceptance of FAA organizational approvals related to maintenance, design, manufacturing and materiel support services for civil-derived aeronautical products. Retrieved from ” https: The scope of recognition is limited to those airworthiness functions that fall within the assigned responsibility of the respective AA. Terms, conditions and sustainment requirements are normally articulated in a recognition certificate and the supporting documentation.